Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

627 results found

  1. Is there a way to automatically remove households from the current Community Queue when a new VI-SPDAT is completed, so they appear on the correct priority list?

    For example, if a client originally completes a Singles VI-SPDAT and later completes a Family VI-SPDAT, they remain stuck on the singles queue. We need a way for the system to automatically remove them from the singles queue and allow the family VI-SPDAT referral to appear on the family queue instead.

    The only solution we have found is deleting the old queue referral, and re-referring to the queue from the new VISPDAT. We…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. It is very time-consuming to set up thousands of units individually. When units share similar characteristics, it would save a significant amount of time if multiple units could be set up at once by adding a "Create Multiple Units" feature, similar to posting multiple units using Availability.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. https://help.bitfocus.com/dashboard-subscription-details
    It would be helpful to be able to drill down directly in the System Subscription Details section to the lists of users/agencies associated with the license seat count numbers. Currently we utilize Looker reports, but quick access from Clarity would be convenient.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Similar to the way users can embed individual Looks on a public-facing website, a customer would like to embed Looker Dashboards on public-facing websites.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  CE Events  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Our CoC creates partnership agencies, which allow workers from multiple organizations to access their collaborative projects. We want all new client profiles and ROIs to be created under the primary program agencies.

    Please create an option to block users from being able to upload ROIs if they are logged into specific agencies.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Currently the Referrals access right allows both the Global REFERRALS tab and the REFERRALS tab in client records. There are multiple use cases where we need users to have access to one or the other but not both of these. We would like to be able to separately assign rights to the referrals tab in client records. Thanks!

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. According to a user in Santa Cruz, they can't e-sign forms using a touchscreen laptop. It requires using a mouse or using an ios or android device. It would be great if they could take advantage of our touchscreen laptops to sign ROI's and other forms directly into clarity and not have to invest in iPads.

    This seems to be an issue with the HTML/script coding of the web page. They found a potential solution here, or at least something to get started https://github.com/szimek/signature_pad.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Automatically display address, when adding a geolocation in the location tab.

    When adding a location in the location tab a geolocation marker can be selected, but the address does not appear. Please add an address filed or auto populate the address to display in the address line 2.

    The end users have to manually add the address.

    This would be a helpful tool for outreach workers, as it would allow them to quickly and easily track the locations of their clients and identify areas where there is a need for services.

    Here are some of the benefits of adding this…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. On the attendance module at the bottom of the tables shows an aggerate count of the number of times that service was recorded for that day. It shows it as "## clients" which is confusing because depending on the service delivery type a service can be recorded for a client more than once per day.

    I suggest changing this to "## entries", "## attendance" or something similar so that it better reflects what count. Right now by indicating "## clients" it is not correct.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. HUD's new EVA data quality tool, provides a powerful resource for identifying data quality issues. However, EVA flags clients with errors and identifies them using the Personal ID. I assume this is because the Unique ID is not available in the export. I'm curious why this is. Is it possible to make the Personal ID searchable in Clarity or to replace it in the export with the Unique ID? I'm trying to find an easy way for our partner agencies to use EVA to find and correct errors, but as of now, it is not easy for them to navigate…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. It would be helpful to have a direct link to the client's profile from the display cards on the Inventory dashboard. This link would show for clients currently referred or occupying a unit.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. We would like to see updates to the HMIS Population Over Time model

    It would be useful to have more data elements including:

    a. Household Type

    b. Relationship to Head of Household

    c. Project Start/Exit Month/Year just like setup in HMIS Performance and Client Model.

    d. Reporting Period Start/End Date

    e. Referrals

    Etc.

    1. It is currently difficult to perform population-based measure without additional data elements in this model. Using a Merge Query doesn't work for visualizations requiring pivot. For example

    a. How to get Households served by different project types over time pivoted by Household Type?

    b. In a quarter…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. We know that Current Living Situation needs to be entered anytime there is contact with a client, or at least every 90 days as community-defined, in our Street Outreach and Coordinated Entry programs.

    Our Call Center enrolls Coordinated Entry clients; most homeless clients are simultaneously enrolled in Street Outreach. Street Outreach then continues to work with these clients – and it seems would need to enter Current Living Situation updates in both the Street Outreach and Coordinated Entry enrollments, which is redundant.

    Can you add a feature in Clarity to cascade CLS updates?

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When editing a program and working with the program options in the the right column, (such as bed list or funding), once one of those options is selected you are unable to tell which program you are editing data for. It would be nice if the program title could carry into the screen you are working in within program admin.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Please allow System Administrators to set Audit Log permissions by role. Agency Managers regularly need to perform data quality checks to see who made what change to a certain field.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. The limiting factor in providing a direct referral to an eligible program is that the agency CoC of the user must be the same as the agency CoC of the program. While an Agency can only be assigned to a single CoC, its Programs can be assigned to a CoC different than the parent agency or even multiple CoCs.

    When the user's CoC does not match the agency CoC for the program to which the user wants to make a referral, the program will not be made available, even though the client might otherwise be eligible.

    The eligibility engine should…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. I would like to add a constraint for users to not allow them to add an annual assessment that is out of the required 60 day range for HUD annual assessments. This is a common DQ issue that could be handled in data entry rather than in a DQ report.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Currently the orange ROI banner shows for clients that have a "no" response to data sharing, which is a valid "active" ROI response. We would like to see a different banner for clients with active ROI's that are a "no" from those that don't have an ROI on file at all. Thank you.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Add an ability at the field level to cascade program data from the Head of Household to other program family members.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. When we create access roles in Clarity we can toggle on the ability to edit, delete, or create assessments with a client but it buckets all of the assessments together. It would be helpful to be able to select which assessments are assigned to which access role. For example, there should be a prevention assessor access role that allows users to complete that assessment but NOT complete the VI-SPDAT assessment.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 6 8 10 31 32
  • Don't see your idea?