Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

627 results found

  1. We receive a warning when there is a date gap between overflow inventory, but date gaps are to be expected due to the nature of that bed availability type. Therefore, the warning "There is a gap in the Bed & Unit Inventory dates for this program. Please update the Bed & Unit Inventory Start or End Dates as appropriate." shouldn't be applied when the gap is related to overflow inventory.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. The Learning Lab at Clarity Connect has been one of the most valued resources for attendees. Customers recognize the support of the Help Desk, but would love to have a regularly scheduled time of "Office Hours" to speak with the experts about data and reporting.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Our CoC had agreed upon a list of denial reasons. We have been using this list for years. When we switched to Clarity, we learned that we cannot customize the list of denial reasons. We also cannot delete any of the reasons. Since the denial reasons don't seem to be HUD mandated, and CoCs can decide what those reasons are, why can't we customize?

    21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When configuring for Managers/Admin, the 'Additional Agency Access' only allows to add one agency at a time- for CoC's that have a lot of agencies, it can be tedious.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Similar to these 2 ideas, we would like the ability to be able to filter the clients shown on the Outreach map by their program type enrollments. In our use case, we would like to limit the results to only those clients who are enrolled in a Street Outreach or Homeless Prevention program.

    https://ideas.bitfocus.com/forums/930328-clarity-human-services/suggestions/49418741-filter-outreach-tool-by-case-manager
    https://ideas.bitfocus.com/forums/930328-clarity-human-services/suggestions/44284701-more-filter-options-for-outreach-map

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Users are able to have inconsistent data when they enter Y/ N to income, non-cash, health insurance and disability and have or do not have sources. Currently there is a warning that pops up when these occur, but we would like to prevent the user from saving the record with these data entry inconsistencies.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. In it not uncommon to provide multiple services to a client in one engagement. Entering services one by one can be time consuming, especially with the requirement to include a location (geolocation feature is not always reliable so it often must be done manually). It would be helpful to be able to select multiple services from a list and assign them to the same client with the same date of service and location. It would also be helpful to be able to choose multiples services when using the attendance feature.

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. When we create access roles in Clarity we can toggle on the ability to edit, delete, or create assessments with a client but it buckets all of the assessments together. It would be helpful to be able to select which assessments are assigned to which access role. For example, there should be a prevention assessor access role that allows users to complete that assessment but NOT complete the VI-SPDAT assessment.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. When updating households that have a Head of Household with an existing enrollment it would be beneficial to have the newly added family members enrollment date be defaulted to the date of the head of household's enrollment vs today's date. This would create less household issues to cleanup later.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Ability to create multiple current living situations (CLS) across programs for one client as to avoid Auto exit and help eliminate extra work for outreach staff. Similar to the way household members CLS can be updated all at once or just certain ones. There should be the same thing with the programs that clients are enrolled in. This way staff are saving time entering data and can focus on helping the clients.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  CE Events  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Add an ability at the field level to cascade program data from the Head of Household to other program family members.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Currently [JRSD-103] Zip Code Jurisdictional Breakout
    provides data on individual clients and on families. Without knowing the exact logic behind the report I would assume "families" is accounting for Clarity households, not only families with children. If the report could be updated to give counts on the number of clients AND the number of Households, rather than "families", there would be a more clear distinction.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. For custom fields where the Field Type is set to Number, we would like the ability to set minimum & maximum values for the data entered.
    For our use case, we are trying to record the number of residents within a given encampment who are either engaged or not engaged based on their current sleeping location. However, the field currently allows negative numbers to be recorded which should never be the case and would negatively affect our client counts in Looker.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. https://help.bitfocus.com/dashboard-subscription-details
    It would be helpful to be able to drill down directly in the System Subscription Details section to the lists of users/agencies associated with the license seat count numbers. Currently we utilize Looker reports, but quick access from Clarity would be convenient.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When viewing results of a Looker query, it would be helpful to have functionality to deduplicate clients in the results so that each client appears on only one row.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Some of our outreach-based end users need to complete assessments with clients in locations that are inaccessible for the internet. It would be helpful to have an offline version of Clarity or Clarity assessments where the data was cached and then uploaded when the end user reconnects to the internet.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Please update the system to align with the data standards terminology by replacing program with project where applicable. We have to do a lot of extra work to explain to users (via documentation, training, etc.) that the system labeling isn't consistent with the definition of project. Thanks for your consideration!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Currently, when you go to the "Referrals" tab from the client profile (to make a "Direct Referral"), you can filter by agency or program category to find the desired program. Users often have to wade through multiple pages of programs using either of these filter options (especially when they are making a referral to a program under a larger agency). It would be great if users could filter or search directly for a specific Program (e.g., add an optional sub-filter if they first choose to filter by agency, or add a search bar similar to the client search bar).

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. The "Pending" tab of the "Referrals" page in Clarity shows all the pending referrals for the agency. For our larger agencies, this can be a very long list that requires providers to click through multiple pages. There is the existing option to sort by program name, but they still have to click through multiple pages if the program they work with is later in the alphabet. It would be great if there was a way to filter for a specific program.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Because of the LSA, we found out we had closed out programs that still had inventories open. Please make it so that the system ends everything with an open date with the same ending date as the program end date. There's no reason to have open bed inventory when the program ends.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?