Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

544 results found

  1. When you create a site of type "Standalone Unit", the system creates a default Building called "Standalone Site Building". If you have multiple sites of this type, you cannot tell them apart in the filter. Please update the naming convention to include the site name in some fashion. That puts the onus on us, the customer, to choose distinct Site Names, which I think is appropriate. I suggest "Standalone" + "Site Name", but I am open to other ideas.

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We have a "centralized" CE agency and program that all users switch to in order to assess and refer to the CQ. However, there is nothing that prevents a user from referring to the CQ from their home agency after the fact (post assessment). This results in CE not being able to complete referrals and impacts the CE dashboard. It would be great if we could set permissions on what agencies can "send" clients to the CQ.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Currently the Referrals access right allows both the Global REFERRALS tab and the REFERRALS tab in client records. There are multiple use cases where we need users to have access to one or the other but not both of these. We would like to be able to separately assign rights to the referrals tab in client records. Thanks!

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When custom fields are added in Clarity Human Services, they are not available to customers with the Customer Data Model (SQL) unless they specifically ask Bitfocus to add them, one field at a time. It would be great if these fields could "automatically" be added and available in the Customer Data Model without having to have a separate request. This automation could occur on a regular daily/weekly/monthly schedule which makes most sense.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add an auto save (example auto save every 2 minutes) function for Clarity notes. Reason for needed feature; in a fast-paced client environment where ringing of phones, walk-ins and appointments- easily distracted while inputting notes. Clarity closes out without saving notes. Feature will auto-save notation before Clarity closes out.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Users should be able to control their email settings to permit or prohibit certain types of auto-notifications.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. For VSPs who use system admins outside of their agency, there are concerns with client privacy based on this line from the database manual.

    "Access to a comparable database is controlled by the VSP. Only staff who work directly with survivors and have a “need to know” professional basis, their supervisors, and agency administrators should be able to view specific client data"

    With this in mind, a new access role for admins of comparable databases using Clarity is being suggested. this access role should allow admins to log into Clarity and pull aggregate reports such as APRs, SPMs, LSA data…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. According to a user in Santa Cruz, they can't e-sign forms using a touchscreen laptop. It requires using a mouse or using an ios or android device. It would be great if they could take advantage of our touchscreen laptops to sign ROI's and other forms directly into clarity and not have to invest in iPads.

    This seems to be an issue with the HTML/script coding of the web page. They found a potential solution here, or at least something to get started https://github.com/szimek/signature_pad.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. It would be helpful to be able to select "tags" for a case note. So the worker can pull up notes and find the ones that are tagged for a specific item. Example, they could put in a case note about meeting with a probation officer, and then before the next meeting, pull up all of the notes that are tagged "Probation", or something like that.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Communities want staff to be able to access units and update units' status from the Inventory module (dashboard) without having to change agency access. They feel that if staff have system-level to the module and edit unit status permissions, they should be able to update the status for the units they have access to.

    Communities may have buildings where the agency that provides services changes over time. In these scenarios, they may set up all buildings under one agency to streamline their setup. In that case, the user's home agency may differ from the agency where the building is setup.…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. It would be beneficial to be able to customize eligibility criteria within the CQ to fully integrate a complex prioritization matrix as well as program-specific criteria. Dynamic chronic homeless status is critical to sort by within the CQ.

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  CE Events  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. We would like to be able to see in the stand alone looker which reports have been published to Clarity, the last time they were viewed, and be able identify which reports use specific fields as they change and/or become obsolete so that we can identify looks that are going to break.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. When you import data using the DIT it should not remove the old assigned staff person and replace it with the person doing the import. It completely wipes out all evidence of who the assigned staff was before and makes it to seem like the person who did the import created the enrollment.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. The Agency Overview (AO) screen is not included in the list of screens accessible to Admins through the System Setup workspace. Not being able to view the screen means admins cannot see the relationship between questions and fields for reporting purposes.

    Similarly, I noticed two other places where the omission of the AO screen appears to have an impact:

    1) Fields unique to the AO screen do not appear in the Field Editor list;

    2) Questions and Fields unique to the AO screen do not appear in the Question and Clarity Fields views, respectively, found in the Project Descriptor model…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. The fields from the Agency Overview screen are mostly stored in the Project Descriptor model of Looker under the "Agency" view. However, not all fields from that screen are represented, and they don't appear to exist anywhere else in Looker.

    Can the fields associated with the following questions from the Agency Overview screen be added to the Agency view in the Project Descriptor model?

    • Navigation Profile
    • Default User Home Screen
    • Dashboard
    • Open Units Report
    • Staff Inventory Access
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. For Looker, it would be very helpful to have a way to identify the penultimate assessment.

    This would be used to compare changes between the most recent assessment or exit with the previous to look for changes. For example, did income change since the last assessment. Not just compare with entry and the most recent/exit.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Would it be possible to add the ability to filter by OR statements in a Dashboard, specifically something like "if the client checked yes to question 1 OR checked yes to question 2, show them in this filter"? We can do this at the individual Look level using a custom dimension, but for dashboards where we need to quickly enable or disable such a filter for 25+ looks at once for data analysis this could present difficulties.

    While we could do individual pulls one at a time, if the question is "how many individuals said yes to one of these…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Hello! Our program has work we do in the community with people that we serve but don't technically become clients officially (and thus we can't collect certain information on them in the client profiles). Sometimes we host workshops or public education, and sometimes we serve anonymous clients such as via a hotline. It would be great if a program could be designated as a "general" program or something similar, where you can perform an assessment or screen that is tied to the program but not tied to a specific client. Could this be done?

    Currently we're using a workaround of…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. We have had a recurring situation where the following takes place:
    1. Client has a “no” ROI recorded by Agency A with no end date (but has an unlocked profile)
    2. Client begins working with staff at Agency B and gives consent/signs ROI
    3. Staff at Agency B try to record this “yes” ROI but cannot; it throws an error for the ROI start date because there is no end date for the previous “no” ROI.
    Staff at Agency B cannot edit and add an end date to the “no” ROI because it was recorded by Agency A.
    Currently when…

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Would be great to have an app version of Clarity that could be used for the PIT and other project enrollments and updates that take place in the field. Another alternative would be updates to the outreach module that would allow users to add assessments or project enrollments.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?