It would be helpful to be able to search within Clarity for an Agency or Program by its ID. This would have been particularly helpful while addressing LSA flags.

Create a warning to notify users when they enter a Housing Move-in Date prior to the Enrollment Date. It should also prevent the user from saving the enrollment. The Housing Move-in Date cannot be prior to the client's enrollment date even if it is a PH to PH transfer. This creates an error on the APR. The APR in Clarity categorizes this as not being housed even though there is a recorded housing move-in date.

This causes problems when trying to troubleshoot the issue.

When a Clarity user leaves and agency, there should be a way to switch all clients on that user's caseload en masse and change them to another assigned staff member, rather than having to go to each client's program page individually.

The Program Roster found within Clarity's Report LIbrary is a popular report. Over the years, many customers have asked for varying modifications to the report to suit local needs. Rather than continuously modifying the report (or rejecting unique modification requests), could a version of the report be made available in Looker that customers could then modify to suit their needs?

A customer has requested the ability to run the APR for multiple selected programs or agencies with the same parameters all at once, but get separate reports for each program/agency as the output.

While Outreach itself is mobile-friendly, the rest of Clarity is less so, leaving outreach workers with a mixed Clarity experience when collecting client data.

This includes client search, assessments, program enrollments, services, current living situation, etc.

The ability to run Program Review Data Quality reports for all programs in an agency would be very helpful. We have agencies with 10+ programs and having to run reports for each program is extremely time consuming. If we had the ability to choose "all programs" it would save me multiple hours per week.

Could you please change the Clarity user interface to check for keystrokes/mouse clicks before asking whether or not I am using Clarity?

Right now it seems to ask after a certain period of time regardless of whether or not I am actively using the product. Sometimes Clarity even interrupts what I am typing to ask if I am still using it! Haha

Thanks, Kevin Rothwell

In order to clean up our Coordinated Entry and Community Queue data, we sometimes need to re-enter/edit/backdate referrals. Our COC analyzes metrics like time between referral date to housing, referral date to program entry, etc. and applying the current system date when adding a referral isn't always accurate.

System admins have the ability to see the time a service item was added to Clarity by manually checking the associated audit log. It would be great to have a 'Time Added' dimension in Looker for checking multiple service items at once.

Personal ID (as opposed to Unique ID) is included in the data extracts for Federal HMIS Partner submissions. Errors in those submissions will identify offending records by Personal ID, however, there's no easy way to search for a record.

Allowing search by Personal ID would be a huge help to the users who are troubleshooting the Federal HMIS Partner uploads.

Create sharing groups for direct referrals that can be programmed by project type. This would allow for agencies to ensure staff only had access to the referrals that they had the authority to refer to.

Allow for the ability to reorder slots in the service setup. Currently they are limited to the order they were created in. This is an issue when trying to organize rooms that are created later but need to be grouped with other rooms within the same section.

Allow for the ability to mark a slot offline (with a date range), as well as a dropdown for the reason offline (maintenance, staff use, etc). This should be able to be configured directly on the bed reservation page by the service provider without having to access the setup/management pages.

I have a suggestion for the '[GNRL-106] Program Roster' report.

It would be extremely helpful if there were a filter added to the report that allowed you to either run the roster for either all clients (as it current runs in our CoC), or to ONLY display assigned heads of household within the program. This would really help several of my programs utilize the report in the way they need to without having to manually remove dependents.

The display constraint for veteran status is built so the question will only display if age = 18 or older. This means the question does not appear for adults that refuse to give a date of birth. We would like a way to populate the veteran question for clients who refuse to give DOB. I created my own workaround for this issue that involved creating a button that hides the veteran status question if the end user indicates "client is a minor" instead of basing the display constraint on the calculated age, but perhaps a better method could be devised.

A customer has requested the ability to have an indicator on the Profile screen that notes if a client is housed in their system. This could be done with the ability to deploy a Live Marker for "Housing Move-In Date Entered" on the profile screen or the creation of a new Live Marker that calculates a "housed" status across the system. This live marker in conjunction with the "Warning" functionality could provide a quick display of housed status.

In order to be considered for PSH opportunities, a participant must have documentation of disability as well as chronicity. Some individuals have enough history in HMIS under the Programs tab to be considered documented for the chronicity requirement of Chronic Homelessness and if there were a field that added that history together and gave us a yes or no answer, this could decrease the barriers in obtaining PSH opportunities.

Allow Agency System Administrators the ability to manage their own agency's user accounts. This would include the ability to deactivate, reactivate, create new users, unlock/lock, and other simple user account management for the agency. A limit of users can be set (if necessary) and if more users are needed then the Agency System Administrator would inquiry for more with the CoC System Administrators (only necessary if there is a user amount limit per agency). [Especially important for large agencies]