Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

474 results found

  1. Zip codes may be associated with more than one city, however, Clarity sometimes forces the wrong city to be recorded.

    For example, when recording an address with zip code 94303, the Clarity will record the city as Palo Alto, though the actual address is in East Palo Alto. (See attachment.)

    This presents an issue in reporting because East Palo Alto is within our County, but Palo Alto is not. Having the flexibility to select any of the cities associated with a zip code would be a significant help.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We have many users that may need access to just one project at another agency but currently there is no way to set that up. If there was a way to allow a user to be at one agency and have access to another agency but not all of the projects within this would be very helpful.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. It would be beneficial, in certain circumstances (temporarily inactive users, etc.), to be able to manually increase our License cap for license types to properly manage and anticipate activation fees when exceeding our cap.

    In our setup, we pass all license fees to participating agencies (license fees and activation fees).

    To give an example:
    Let's say we have 100 licenses, 100 are in use and active. 5 users go on leave temporarily for a few months and are inactivated. We are then at 95/100 active licenses.

    Let's say we train 2 users bringing us to 97/100. All 5 users come…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Extend the XML schema to include Notes, Contacts, Appointments and Locations.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Knowing the number of views for Dashboards and Looks in Data Analysis would help admins determine which ones are useful.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Setting up a new Service Taxonomy is relatively easy, but applying a Service Taxonomy to Service Items is not. There can be thousands of Service Items within a Clarity instance to which Admins might need to apply just one taxonomy code. A tool that allows admins to search for Service Items and apply taxonomy codes would remove a significant barrier to the usage of Service Taxonomies.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. It would be very helpful to have a search tool for the library. Some features:

    • Search all folders

    • Search by part of title or report number

    • Prompt suggested matches

    Nice to have:

    • Option to designate which folder to search in... i.e. Admin Reports only
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Customers are often need to create complicated Clarity screens, programs and services (assessments and/or program enrollment, update, exit screens). Because of the difficulty involved, admins like to build a first draft on a training site to make sure the new elements work the way they hope.

    Could there be feature that allows customers to copy these complicated screens, programs, and services from one instance to another, like a training site to a live site?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. At this time the toggle is only able to be used for new records or where records are only used by one agency. A customer has requested to be able to use the toggle on shared records because at times multiple agencies share the use of de-ID'd profiles (ie coordinated entry). Proposed enhancement to allow the toggle to be used with shared records and give the option to automatically send a clarity mail notice or e-mail notification to those listed as an agency contact stating that their client has been de-identified, contact sys admin for details.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. A customer has requested a feature enhancement in which there can be a 'Make Program Private' toggle on the Program Set Up page in order to lock individual programs down to an agency in which only those agency users would be able view the programs history on the client profile. (similar to the 'Make Program Private' functionality within individual enrollment when editing a 'Case Manager' assignment).

    In addition, I feel as though if we had a 'Make Program Private' toggle, we should also incorporate a 'Make Service Private' toggle on the Service Set Up page as there are frequently services…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Some staff are data entry staff and automatically get assigned as a care team member. I would be great to toggle this OFF so that community members don't attempt to contact data entry staff for care coordination. This is especially true for NBN shelters, as they don't tend to assign case management at the point of enrollment. So, either toggle off at user level if they are data entry only OR toggle off at program if the care team doesn't mean the same thing for a particular program.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. For data validation, it would be helpful to be able to set minimum and maximum limits for numeric/integer fields. For example, if we use a 1-4 scale and someone enters "40", a user should not be able to save that data on the screen. While reporting and label/warnings can be used to help prevent this sort of invalid entry, it would be helpful if the system did not allow it in the first place if configured appropriately.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. In it not uncommon to provide multiple services to a client in one engagement. Entering services one by one can be time consuming, especially with the requirement to include a location (geolocation feature is not always reliable so it often must be done manually). It would be helpful to be able to select multiple services from a list and assign them to the same client with the same date of service and location. It would also be helpful to be able to choose multiples services when using the attendance feature.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. It'd be great if the system could/would send automatic emails when a funding source is set to expire and there will be no active funding source for a project.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Funding  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When creating a service we'd love the ability to set services up so they can only be accessed/tracked/created in the HoH's program only. We have programs that we need to have users only track under the HoH. However, users sometimes forget and will track services under the second adult in the HH or under the children. This causes issues when we are running custom reports that are set to only pull information from the HoH and the services provided.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. While it's not an enrollment-based requirement... it is a data standards requirement.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Hello! Hope everything is going well. Our staff migrated to Clarity from ETO, and one feature that ETO has that Clarity doesn't is the ability to organize the Assessment history (known as Touchpoints to their system). Instead of providing them all in one list, it sorts them by the Assessment type, making it easier to find the specific one you're trying to view, edit, or delete. This would be a great way to not only help existing Clarity users but also help Clarity compete with other databases for those who could be moved to our side.

    You can see a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. After a referral to a unit is made from the community queue, a provider enrolls a client to the corresponding program and the client is automatically added to the unit in the referral, both with the current date. However, for Permanent Housing projects, when a Housing Move-In Date is entered, the user has to then manually update the unit start date to reflect the true first night that the client moved into and slept in the unit. Functionality that would allow the Unit Start Date to update based on the Housing Move-In Date entered would help improve this workflow.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. There are currently 2 fields in Clarity that collect information regarding a client's citizenship status (citizenstatus & uscitizen). However, neither of these fields are available for us to pull into Looker to build reports off of. We would like to have these 2 fields added so that we can pull a client's citizenship information.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?