Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

761 results found

  1. Password requirements are clearly stated in the Help Center, but when a user is actually selecting a password, there could be more specific feedback on which requirements are not being met.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We have a client locations report by service only. We need one by program enrollment as well. Please allow this option as well, either through the same report or a new one. (https://get.clarityhs.help/hc/en-us/articles/115002702248--GNRL-112-Client-Address-Location)

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. After creating a new Funding Source there isn’t a way to
    • Modify Funding Source and Funding Source Non Federal fields, they are grayed out or
    • I also can’t Delete Funding Source.

    We need to have Funding Source and Funding Source Non Federal fields and delete Funding Source option available.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. CLNT-127 Homeless Status Timeline Report currently return a '?' for Services Only programs that containCLS assessments denoting Homeless Situations"

    Please update the report to show "Y".

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Data element 2.02.3 Operating Start Date is labeled on the project setup screen as "Operating Start" and in Looker as "Availability Start."

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. We have community queues for each of our service regions as well as our major urban area. We have clients that bounce around or may be willing to relocate, so they may be referred to multiple community queues. When case managers enter notes, they only see what is entered based on what queue they access the client from, even though other agencies in a different region may be working with or housing the same client (ie: a client is sheltered in Lincoln but wants to move to the Panhandle, they would be referred to both the Lincoln queue and BOS…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. This is two requests:
    Clearer descriptions of current sharing settings
    More flexibility than current sharing settings allow

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. For checkbox fields, add indicator allowing it to be marked as "answered" so that we can see whether a checkbox field has actually been answered. Checkbox fields are currently not able to be set as "Required" because of their logic. It would be good to know whether the question is set at 0/Off because that is the actual answer rather than if they simply didn't answer the question. This is a potential Data Quality gap in the system.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. As an alternative to capturing everything through data collection in Clarity, better document management features could help meet customers' needs.

    A “Files Screen” for each uploaded document with meta-data and/or custom fields so there could be more robust reporting on collected documents could be really helpful with case management.

    For example, when a client's drivers license has been scanned and uploaded, there could be a custom "DL Expiration" field associated with that upload.

    Since a valid DL is almost always required in order to sign a lease or to obtain employment. we could be on the lookout for expiring DL's…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Add the ability to downvote an idea on this site. This will provide system administrators the opportunity to express concern with an idea, and I suggest that if something is downvoted, a comment should be required to explain the potential issues if the idea is implemented.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Priority: Level 2

    As a System Administrator, I want to have the option for the current living situation have a toggle so that we can toggle it off for some projects that do not need to record CLS. Can Bitfocus enable the ability to add the CLS at the project level or indicate whether it’s required there?

    This will cause extra work for us and may necessitate the creation of additional custom templates, which we hope to avoid. It is difficult to only have the option to make a CLS available at the template level, which then means it is…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Our matchmakers would like the ability show the Client Unique ID in the queue results in the new interface as an alternative to the client name. This leads to a better use of the queue for a PBNL since it is anonymised.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. In the old Clarity user interface, if a client has a program restriction assigned it will show an alert when trying to enroll them in a program. Could we please add this to Horizon as well so that staff who may not be tech savvy enough to find the Program Restriction new location can still see the alert? Thank you!

    Currently, an alert is present in Horizon, but only shows up if a client is viewed from an already enrolled program, which doesn't stop someone in the moment of enrolling.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Our CoC is moving to a new referral model that is based on geographic location within the CoC i.e. referrals in the northern part of the CoC go to provider A, referrals in the southern part of the CoC go to provider B. We were able to add a map layer to visualize this for CE to complete an additional field to filter the queues by, but the Community Queue itself does not offer any mechanism to filter by already collected geography based fields.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Users are forced to take orientation lock on their phones off, go into landscape mode and delicately caputre the location. This causes frustration and incorrect location data

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. On the program restrictions screen, there is a private toggle. We want a setting that enables us to remove that private restriction toggle, so that all restrictions are viewable to everyone consistently.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We have agencies with tons of services.

    Scrolling through the services box is inefficient.

    It'd be nice if we could filter via regex or at least search.

    IE, if I want to select all services that have [Program1] in the name

    I can add a filter where text must include "[Program1]"

    And it'll be as if I clicked [Program1] Service 1, [Program1] Service 2, [Program1] Service 3

    Of course, adding multiple filters to a single query is always helpful.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Would it be beneficial to set the privacy at a project level rather than the agency level?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sharing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Currently, when a client shares their location through the portal, this information does not appear on the outreach map.

    Would it be possible for this shared location data to also be displayed on the outreach map? This feature would be very helpful for tracking and coordinating outreach efforts more effectively.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. We have several programs in one building in real life, so accordingly we revised our inventory functions to have all programs in one building. Previously, we had them in separate buildings, but needed to merge them so we can reassign units to different programs as needed. So for a while, we got used to sorting by building to get to different programs, but can't do that anymore. It would be great if we could sort by programs the same way we can filter by agency, site, etc. Thank you!

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?