Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

544 results found

  1. We use ROIs as a record of a client's history of consent to share their information. Once a profile is created, it is too easy to make changes that mess up that history. Adding an access right to the roles would help us keep a record of our client's consent. There is an access right for "Client Reports". This request is consistent with that existing access right.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When selecting parameters for certain reports like System Performance Measures, there is a small selection box for things like Agencies and Programs. When selecting dozens or hundreds of items in these categories, the selection box is very tedious. If there could be a pop-out window to make selections and not have to scroll up and down so much it would be a better UI. Confirming selections is difficult when you can only see a few at a time. Also, check-boxes rather than shift-select would make this selection process much easier.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Currently when status updates are completed in the outreach module, the date always defaults to the current date. Many outreach workers are not able to enter these updates in real time so it would be very helpful to be able to back date when entering the data.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Create a Live Marker to calculate the number of days between the Approximate Date Started and Project Start fields. This will allow us to create warnings for very old Approximate Date Started Dates, and warnings to notify users when the data collected doesn't make sense. For example, if a client's Approx. Date Started is at least three years ago they should have only one episode of homeless according to the data collection instructions in the Data Standards.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Currently, service items with multiple attendance Delivery Type do not report the same as service items with other Delivery Types (Long Term, Single Event, and Daily Attendance). All service data should be stored and reported in the same manner.

    See the note within [GNRL-104] Service Summary report article as an example, "Note: For the purposes of this report, multiple attendance services are limited to a count of 1 per day in the # of Services column."

    https://help.bitfocus.com/gnrl-104-service-summary

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Adding a filter for the agencies and/or projects that an agency can or has referred to would simplify counting referrals that were made to specific agencies. Some agencies send referrals to more than one agency or project and it would drastically decrease the amount of time needed to count referrals sent.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Referrals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We greatly value your feedback. This item is undergoing further consideration by our Data Services Team.


    In the interim, our Coordinated Entry - Referrals LookML Dashboard series may provide some of the information you are looking for, or could be used as a template for a custom Look to fit the reporting need. 

  8. It would be really great if we were able to search by participant phone number. I get a lot of calls where I can't fully decipher the name they give me on the voicemail message but they leave a phone number. I can sometimes​ call them back and figure it out of course, but it's really helpful to be able to find their name for folks whose phones don't work/turned off, etc. This makes it much easier to follow up with their housing.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Services  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. When searching for a staff member in Clarity, search results display the agency that the staff person is associated with. It would be helpful to System Admins to be able to click directly on the Agency name in the search results to switch to that agency

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Similar to the way that System Administrators can add custom fields to a Program Set-up screen, it would be helpful to be able to add custom fields to other screen types, especially the Agency Overview screen

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Some of our assessments are lengthy and it would be helpful to be able to apply text formatting to labels. Also, it would be helpful if we were able to add horizontal lines to delineate between sections in an assessment.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. A client that was unable to locate at the time of referral to a housing intervention should be removed from the community queue and re-referred once they resurface in Clarity (service transaction or program enrollment)

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Remove clients from the community queue if the do not have an active release of information. Add a prompt to the client profile that states client has been removed and should be referred to community queue once a release of information is updated. (Anonymous profiles excluded)

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. The system should not allow the program start date to occur after the housing move-in date. The program start date should never occur after the housing move in date. Since the program start date defaults to the current date and allows users to save (after displaying a gentle light-orange warning that does not seem to be a deterrant), this issue continues.

    24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Allow for filtering/sorting of assessment score when referring to a unit from the unit queue without configuring unit eligibility.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Everyone loves the Program Data Review report in the report library. Makes data corrections a breeze.

    However, if the user creating could be added, it would be fascistic. By adding this field, it would allow agency managers and supervisor monitor which case manager are reviewing and correct their data and allow them to address these types of issues with the proper person.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. More flexibility with sharing set up. Sharing should be on a project level, not an agency level.
    Should also be able to pick what agencies and programs can see a client file per what the client would like. Right now the sharing is extremely restricting and causes issue with programs like RHY, who are not allowed to share clients that are 17 and under. If an agency has RHY, CoC and ESG funding this makes set up difficult and can cause users to make major errors and share files they should not be sharing.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. It would be helpful to include an inactive description field when a user changes a unit to inactive. Users can include information that the community may need to reference later. For example, referencing this info may be particularly important when preparing the HIC or LSA reports.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inventory  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. When clients receive a tag of "Housed" or "Sheltered" on the Outreach map, they should be automatically removed from either the encampment or the map. The same should happen for clients who have an address added to the Location tab, which does not qualify as a place not meant for human habitation.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Outreach  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Live Marker for Programapplicability. Often we need screen fields to display only for certain kinds of programs. The Programtype Live Marker is good for this sometimes. But many times we want only a subset of the whole programtype. For example, we have different types of Emergency Shelter which we differentiate with Programapplicability. We have over 200 Emergency Shelters that are Crisis or Bridge. In order to display a screen field just for them we must make a separate constraint item for each of those 200 programids. And then maintain that list as programs are added

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?