327 results found
-
Sheltered PIT screen for non-participating programs
A customer has suggested that having a screen or other place to collect sheltered PIT data counts in Clarity for non-participating agencies/programs would be helpful. Rather than needing to collect this data in external places like Excel and then blending with Clarity sheltered PIT data, it would be great to have all the PIT data in one permanent place. This data could then be pulled in to the PIT/HIC reports in the Clarity report library.
11 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Cascading from status/annual/exit screens to new enrollments
Customers have expressed the desire to have data fields entered in status/annual/exit screens to cascade into new enrollments. We know that enrollments can cascade into other enrollments, and that there are data fields entered at enrollment that are not collected in the status/annual/exit screens. However, the data would be most useful and accurate if cascading considered most recent data fields from the enrollment AND status/annual/exit screen. The goal would be to have the most recent fields from the enrollment and status/annual/exit screens cascade to subsequent enrollments.
11 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
exit
Update the 'Exit' to say 'Program Exit' to make it more clear. Right now it looks like it was an after thought and it is just to xxit the file.
11 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Record CLS with services
Combine the process of providing services and recording a current living situation (CLS). Ideally, when providing a service in an outreach program, an additional section on the service would prompt to fill out a CLS assessment. The goal is to make sure that CLS is recorded each time a service is given, and is done on the same page and through the same process to save staff time. The standard CLS process should also be available in case an outreach worker contacts a client without providing a service.
11 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Allow for Agency Names to be automatically configured as part of Looker Agency folder names
When saving a Look/dashboard to a specific agency's Data Analysis folder in standalone Looker, the folders are labeled with only the agency's agency ID. Users have to first locate the agency ID before they can save the Look/Dashboard o the proper folder as most people do not know them off of the top of their head. If updated, the folders need to still reference the Agency ID so that each agency has a unique identifier, but if the Clarity code could be altered so that these folder names could also contain the agency name, it would make it much more…
11 votes -
Include Data Quality Markers for Client Merge Tool
Have the client merge tool include data quality markers to help determine which record is the best primary based on the quality of the data entered.
11 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Custom Notifications for Assessments
Users should have the ability to create a custom notification, for example to alert them when an assessment is due or coming due. This could be similar to the notification for Annual Assessments, except able to be used with any assessment, even custom assessments
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
password
It would be helpful for there to be an option and/or button on the log in screen to show the password so that users can know if they mistype something.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Improve Assessments Features within Program Enrollments in Clarity
Clarity is not currently meeting our CoC’s need to easily understand what’s due with Assessments and add as needed. There are several points of feedback we have about the Assessments tab within a Program Enrollment, to make it clearer for our end users. This is made more important by the Current Living Situation assessment now being required.
Current issues for our end users are:
· Current heading is “Status Assessments” which to them = Status Update Assessment
· “Assessment Due” is unclear- what kind of Assessment is due? Annual, Status Update, Current Living Situation? No way to click through. If…
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
System Notification for Referral Updates and New Notes to the Agency Receiving the Referral
System notifications for Updated Referrals and New Referral Notes are sent only to the staff member who created the referral. This is to request that these automated system notifications also be sent to the Staff Member at the Referred-To Program. Notes are also only visible. This would improve communication between different teams and save referred-to agencies from clicking through each client on the referral list checking for updates.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
HUD field Constraints
Whenever the HUD data standards are updated, we find that we have to replicate Bitfocus's constraints for our custom screens. Instead, adding the option to apply the already made constraint to the screen would be useful...either at the field level (Use current constraint for any screen when field is added) option or screen level (copy constraint to screen when field is added) option...
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Email sent out to Navigator when assigned in Community Queue
When a Navigator is assigned in the Community Queue, it will help tremendously if the Navigator receives an email to know she/he has been assigned a new client. This will avoid having to do an extra step of having to email the Navigator.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Additional Options for Capturing 'Prioritization Status' for Coordinated Entry Assessments (4.19)
Related to the existing idea advocating for 4.20 Coordinated Entry Events to be Service based Events instead of Inferred Events, (https://ideas.bitfocus.com/forums/930328-clarity-human-services/suggestions/43917810-provide-access-to-data-element-4-20-response-categ), there is an additional need related to how the 'Prioritization Status' associated with 4.19 Coordinated Entry Assessments is captured within Clarity.
Currently, the only way to capture that a client has been 'Placed on prioritization list' (4.19_7.1) is if the Coordinated Entry Assessment associated with the client is placed on a Community Queue. For communities that choose to take advantage of the CQ functionality offered by Clarity, this works well, but for communities who choose not to…
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Change display constraints for veteran status question
The display constraint for veteran status is built so the question will only display if age = 18 or older. This means the question does not appear for adults that refuse to give a date of birth. We would like a way to populate the veteran question for clients who refuse to give DOB. I created my own workaround for this issue that involved creating a button that hides the veteran status question if the end user indicates "client is a minor" instead of basing the display constraint on the calculated age, but perhaps a better method could be devised.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Option to pull client level reports with PII redacted/missing
Agencies and communities are required to provide redacted client records when monitored by HUD. Currently, agency staff print the reports, cross through client PII, scan reports, and submit them to HUD. Often the redaction is insufficient. It would be very awesome if users could choose to pull client-level reports excluding PII to serve this purpose.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Audit log access
Please allow System Administrators to set Audit Log permissions by role. Agency Managers regularly need to perform data quality checks to see who made what change to a certain field.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Client Specific Assessment Report
It would be helpful to have a report that can be found in the Client Reports section that returns full details on Assessments. It seems like that should already exist based on what reports are available for clients but somehow it doesn't. Something that allows you to select the Assessment(s) you want included and the date range (like the GNRL-210 Assessment Details Report) but for one specific client that can be easily printed.
10 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
E-signing doesn't work with touchscreen laptop
According to a user in Santa Cruz, they can't e-sign forms using a touchscreen laptop. It requires using a mouse or using an ios or android device. It would be great if they could take advantage of our touchscreen laptops to sign ROI's and other forms directly into clarity and not have to invest in iPads.
This seems to be an issue with the HTML/script coding of the web page. They found a potential solution here, or at least something to get started https://github.com/szimek/signature_pad.
9 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Ability to use/customize program eligibility criteria within the CQ
It would be beneficial to be able to customize eligibility criteria within the CQ to fully integrate a complex prioritization matrix as well as program-specific criteria. Dynamic chronic homeless status is critical to sort by within the CQ.
9 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
-
Ability to delete services within an enrollment
Currently, users have the option to edit a service, unlink it from one program, and then link it to a different program within the Program Service page. They do not have the option to delete the service from the program level history page, instead, they have to navigate to the Client History page to delete the service.
It would be beneficial if users also had the option to delete a service within the Program Service page.
9 votesThank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
- Don't see your idea?