Settings and activity
37 results found
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesJoshua Fuentes
shared this idea
·
-
12 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
An error occurred while saving the comment Joshua Fuentes
commented
Agreed, this does give our HMIS team significant extra work fixing dates (example: HUD UDE 3.917, Prior Living Situation can have dates thousands of years in the distant future).
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesJoshua Fuentes
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesJoshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joshua Fuentes
commented
We have found this to be a big pain point and a barrier for backdating / imputing accurate referral outcomes. We have to ask Clarity to update / correct denial dates each time instead of doing it ourselves.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
An error occurred while saving the comment Joshua Fuentes
commented
Being able to create this field type would be a game changer in many respects, allowing us to bring in helpful data points on to custom assessment screens.
Joshua Fuentes
shared this idea
·
-
12 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJoshua Fuentes
shared this idea
·
-
27 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesJoshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
56 votesJoshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently reviewing this request.
Joshua Fuentes
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesJoshua Fuentes
shared this idea
·
This would be amazing! We have numerous assessments that are intended for specific users / roles (veteran validation assessment, health plan assessment, supplemental CE assessments, AMHD assessment) but there currently isn't a way to really limit which specific users are meant to complete certain assessments (rather than relying on assigned organization).