Skip to content

Settings and activity

10 results found

  1. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Scott Jackson commented  · 

    I agree. Currently the 'Mode' filter dropdown shows all assessment processors that are active in the system.

    The Clarity Help Center states that Mode, "limits the search results based on the assessment processor used to generate the referral." However, since the Mode dropdown shows all active processors, it can be difficult for the end user to select the mode associated with assessments in use on
    the queue.

    It would be great if the you could control which assessment processors are available for each community queue under Referral Settings, or even better if the Mode options could automatically only include the assessment processors that are connected to assessments in use on the queuee.

    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Scott Jackson commented  · 

    This would be a great time-saver for sys admins. Similarly, as a sys admin I think it would be helpful to be able to change the access role for a staff member across multiple agencies that they have additional access to in bulk. Currently, any change to the access role needs to applied individually to each agency under additional agency access that the staff member is assigned, which can be time-consuming if the staff member is assigned to a large number of agencies.

    This also makes make think of other ways that additional bulk actions could be used to improve efficiency for sys admins in staff adminstration, for example, being able to change the access role of multiple staff accounts at once, or applying any change to staff settings to multiple staff at once

    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  4. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson shared this idea  · 
  6. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson shared this idea  · 
  8. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  9. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson supported this idea  · 
  10. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott Jackson supported this idea  ·