Skip to content

Clarity Human Services

Thanks for taking the time to suggest improvements to Clarity Human Services! 

If you don't see a category for your idea or don't know what category to choose, you can leave the category blank. We'll sort it out!

View our full feature request policy here.

Clarity Human Services

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

29 results found

  1. Having to publish custom fields to Looker before being able to analyze those assessments at all is prohibitive and discourages data use. Instead, fields should be immediately available as field/question-answer pairs in Looker, so we can pull the data out, crosstab it, etc.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    After investigating this functionality, we are unable to implement this idea. The impact of immediate publication of Clarity fields for data analytics would be detrimental to Looker performance which is a shared resource. 

  2. When using the gear icon on fields in embedded Looker fields in the data pane, the tooltip for the field comes up. The tooltip then blocks a lot of the items in the gear menu, such as Remove (sometimes it flashes while hovering over the top item in the list). This prevents you from clicking on the menu item. To improve this, please make the tooltip not come up when you are using the gear icon, only when hovering over the field name itself.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When moving from other platforms to Clarity, we were extremely disappointed to lose the functionality of staff not being able to run custom reports that data and evaluation staff (Agency Managers) build, and to filter them accordingly. Program managers running their own reports has been part of our workflow and efforts to build data culture for years. It is unfathomable that Clarity does not allow us to save and organize reports for end users to run. Please figure out a way to do this!!

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Clarity Human Services has a built-in data analysis tool for ad hoc/custom reporting. Access to it is controlled by a user's access role. If you do not have access, you should talk to your agency manager or System Administrator for your Clarity instance.

  4. Please allow a destination of OneDrive/SharePoint for scheduled reports in addition to Google Drive.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It would be beneficial for Agency Managers to have the ability to create dashboards instead of that functionality being limited to only the System Admin role. Agency evaluation staff know what their staff need/want to know for evaluation and reporting needs. Dashboard creation sitting only with the System Admin role creates an unnecessary bottle-neck for agencies that have custom reporting knowledge and capacity.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Currently, prior_residence is collected for adults and shows null for children when queried in Looker. This dimension would help with reporting for PIT and funding.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your submission! While this item will not be added to our roadmap at this time, we greatly value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting ideas for future consideration.


    Prior Residence is a retired field. Looker reports on what is collected on Clarity, and HUD Data Standards advise only collecting this data on Head of Households and Adults.

  7. We would like to generate public dashboards that display key coordinated entry metrics.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your submission! While this item will not be added to our roadmap at this time, we greatly value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting ideas for future consideration.

  8. Add Age column to GNRL-220 Program Details Report

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your feedback and for submitting this idea to uservoice. This update to the [GNRL-220] Program Details Report is not currently on our road map. 

    In the interim, age can be calculated using the date of birth column within the excel document - one way to collect current age would be to utilize the following expression: "=DATEDIF(desired cell,TODAY(),"y")". 

    While this item will not be added to our roadmap at this time, we greatly value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting ideas for future consideration.

  9. We would like their Matchers to have Looker Access; however they do not want them to be able to view any data marked "Private."

    I think this can be accomplished through using [Access Filters (with User Attributes)|https://discourse.looker.com/t/access-filters-with-user-attributes/4596]

    Ideally we would like a few different Looker access roles, outlined in the attached matrix. Ideally, this would be adjustable and managed by the Collaborative admins for flexibility.
    [^Looker Access Matrix.xlsx]

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?